Best SOC 2 Compliance Automation Tools
Continuous controls monitoring platforms that automate evidence collection and keep you audit-ready for SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
For most teams chasing a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report, Vanta and Drata are the two platforms to shortlist first: both automate evidence collection through cloud and app integrations, run continuous control checks, and route findings straight to auditors. Secureframe and Sprinto are strong alternatives if you want more hands-on onboarding or a lighter, startup-priced setup. Scrut Automation and Thoropass bundle in extras (a built-in risk register, and in Thoropass's case the audit itself). Hyperproof and Anecdotes.ai fit larger orgs juggling many overlapping frameworks and heavy evidence volumes. Choose on integration coverage for your actual stack, framework breadth, and whether you want the audit bundled or want to bring your own auditor.
SOC 2 used to mean months of screenshots, spreadsheets, and Slack pings to engineers asking for proof that logging was on and access was reviewed. Continuous controls monitoring platforms replaced most of that. They connect to your cloud accounts, identity provider, code repos, HR system, and ticketing tools, pull evidence automatically, map it to a control framework, and flag drift the moment a control breaks (a public S3 bucket, an offboarded employee who still has access, MFA switched off).
The category is crowded and the tools look similar in a demo, so the real decision comes down to a few concrete things: how many of your specific tools have native (not generic) integrations, how many frameworks you need now and in two years, how much hands-on help you want, and whether you want the platform and the audit from one vendor or separately. This guide ranks eight of the most credible options for that use case, best-first for a team standing up SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and is honest about where each one is weak. Vanta and Drata lead for breadth, but Sprinto, Scrut Automation, Thoropass, Secureframe, Hyperproof, and Anecdotes.ai each win specific situations.
Top Picks
Based on features, user feedback, and value for money.
| Tool | Starting price | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta | From $833.33/mo | 4.7(2,722) | Startups and mid-market teams getting a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report with little in-... |
| Drata | Custom | 4.7(1,401) | Scaling companies that want deep automation and granular control mapping across multipl... |
| Secureframe | Custom | 4.7(881) | Teams that want hands-on help mapping controls and interpreting requirements, not just... |
| Sprinto | Custom | 4.7(1,684) | SaaS startups and SMBs prioritizing quick, affordable time-to-report. |
| Scrut Automation | Custom | 4.9(1,451) | Teams managing several frameworks at once who want risk and compliance in one console. |
| Thoropass | Custom | 4.7(585) | Teams that want the platform and the SOC 2 or ISO audit delivered together. |
| Hyperproof | Custom | 4.6(338) | Larger or regulated orgs that need program and risk management, not just SOC 2 automation. |
| Anecdotes.ai | Custom | n/a | Enterprises with large evidence volumes and complex, multi-framework compliance operati... |
Startups and mid-market teams getting a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report with little in-house GRC staff.
Vanta's pricing is on the higher end, with the 'Core' tier starting at $10,000/year and 'Plus/Growth' at $15,000+.
Watch out
Potential for overage fees on usage
Scaling companies that want deep automation and granular control mapping across multiple frameworks.
Drata's pricing model, based on custom quotes and company size, suggests it's likely on the higher end of the market, especially given the comprehensive features offered.
Watch out
Potential seat minimums for enterprise
Teams that want hands-on help mapping controls and interpreting requirements, not just software.
Secureframe's pricing, starting around $7,500/year for the Fundamentals tier, is on the higher end for compliance automation.
SaaS startups and SMBs prioritizing quick, affordable time-to-report.
Sprinto's pricing model, based on custom quotes for all tiers, makes it difficult to assess fairness without specific numbers.
Watch out
Premium support might be an add-on
Teams managing several frameworks at once who want risk and compliance in one console.
Teams that want the platform and the SOC 2 or ISO audit delivered together.
Larger or regulated orgs that need program and risk management, not just SOC 2 automation.
Enterprises with large evidence volumes and complex, multi-framework compliance operations.
Anecdotes.ai employs an enterprise-focused 'Request Pricing' model, which typically indicates a higher price point customized to individual organizational needs.
Watch out
Potential high minimum contract values
Other Compliance Management worth considering
Beyond the editorial top picks, these are also strong choices we evaluated.
What It Is
SOC 2 compliance automation tools (also called continuous controls monitoring or GRC automation platforms) are software that automates the evidence collection and monitoring behind a security audit. Instead of manually gathering proof that controls are working, you connect the platform to your infrastructure and business systems (AWS, GCP, Azure, Okta or Google Workspace, GitHub, Jira, an HRIS), and it continuously tests controls, collects timestamped evidence, maps that evidence to a framework like SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001, and gives your auditor a portal to review it. Most also handle policy templates, security awareness training, access reviews, and vendor risk, so the platform becomes the system of record for your compliance program rather than a folder of screenshots.
Why It Matters
The cost of SOC 2 is mostly engineering time and calendar time, and that is exactly what these platforms compress. Manual evidence collection pulls senior engineers away from product work for weeks, and a single missed control can push an audit window back a full quarter. Automation matters for three concrete reasons. First, it turns a point-in-time scramble into a continuous state, so a Type II observation window is monitored the whole time rather than reconstructed at the end. Second, it catches drift early: MFA disabled, an over-privileged account, or an expired security review get flagged as they happen instead of surfacing during the audit. Third, most buyers need the report to close enterprise deals, so time-to-audit is a revenue lever, not just a checkbox. The wrong tool (weak integrations for your stack, or a framework you outgrow) quietly adds manual work back in and erases the savings, which is why fit matters more than feature count.
Key Features to Look For
Native integrations for your actual stack (cloud, identity, code, HR, ticketing) rather than generic connectors that still require manual uploads
Automated, timestamped evidence collection mapped to specific SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria or ISO 27001 Annex A controls
Continuous control monitoring with alerting on drift (public storage, disabled MFA, unreviewed access, offboarding gaps)
Multi-framework support with shared control mapping, so evidence collected once satisfies SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and more
An auditor collaboration portal so your assessor can review evidence in-platform instead of over email
Policy templates, security awareness training, and automated access reviews to cover the non-technical controls
Vendor and risk management (a risk register, vendor security reviews) for the governance side of the audit
What to Consider
Mistakes to Avoid
- ×
Buying on framework count instead of integration fit. A platform that lists 20 frameworks but lacks a native connector for your identity provider or cloud will push evidence work back onto your team.
- ×
Assuming the platform price includes the audit. The software and the CPA firm audit are usually separate line items, and the auditor fee is often the larger of the two (Thoropass is the notable exception that bundles both).
- ×
Treating it as set-and-forget. Continuous monitoring only helps if someone owns the alerts; unattended failing controls still fail the audit.
- ×
Underestimating the human controls. Access reviews, onboarding and offboarding, and vendor reviews still need a real process; the tool tracks them, it does not run them for you.
- ×
Over-buying for stage. A single first SOC 2 does not need an enterprise GRC platform, and an enterprise with many frameworks will outgrow a lightweight startup tool.
- ×
Skipping the integration proof-of-concept. Demos always look clean; connect your real accounts during the trial and check how much evidence lands automatically versus manually.
Expert Tips
- →
Run the trial against your live stack, not the sandbox. The only number that matters is the percentage of controls with evidence collected automatically after you connect your real cloud, IdP, and repos.
- →
Start with one framework and expand. Get SOC 2 working end to end, then turn on ISO 27001 or HIPAA and reuse the shared control mapping instead of buying separate tooling later.
- →
Separate the platform decision from the auditor decision unless you deliberately want them bundled. Ask which audit firms already work in the platform so review goes smoothly.
- →
Give the platform read-only, least-privilege access to cloud accounts, and confirm what permissions each integration requires before you approve it.
- →
Negotiate on frameworks and term. Prices often jump per added framework and per seat, so scope what you truly need this year and get multi-year pricing in writing.
- →
Assign a single owner for control alerts before launch. Continuous monitoring is only worth it if failing controls get triaged the same week they trip.
The Bottom Line
If you are a startup or mid-market team getting your first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report, shortlist Vanta and Drata first: they have the broadest integrations, the most auditor familiarity, and the most polished first-timer workflows, and the choice between them usually comes down to demos on your own stack. Want more hands-on guidance? Look at Secureframe. Optimizing for speed and startup pricing on a cloud-native stack? Sprinto. Running several frameworks and want risk built in? Scrut Automation. Prefer the platform and the audit from one vendor? Thoropass. If you are a larger or regulated org with many overlapping frameworks and heavy evidence volumes, Hyperproof and Anecdotes.ai are built for that scale. In every case, judge the tool on how much evidence it collects automatically for your real systems, not on the length of its framework list.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it take to get audit-ready with a compliance automation platform?
It depends on your stack and starting maturity, but connecting integrations and collecting the bulk of evidence is usually fast (days to a few weeks). The longer part is the SOC 2 Type II observation window, during which controls must operate continuously, and closing any control gaps the platform surfaces. Tools like Sprinto and Vanta are built to shorten the readiness phase, but no platform removes the observation period an auditor requires.
Do these tools include the actual audit, or do I still hire an auditor?
For most of them the software and the audit are separate: the platform automates evidence and monitoring, then you engage an independent CPA firm to issue the SOC 2 report. Thoropass is the main exception here, offering the platform and the audit from one vendor. The others (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and the rest) partner with a network of audit firms, so budget for the auditor fee as a separate line item.
Vanta vs Drata: how do I choose between the two leaders?
They overlap heavily on framework coverage, continuous monitoring, and auditor networks, so the decision usually comes down to your own trial. Connect your real cloud, identity provider, and repositories to both and compare how much evidence lands automatically, how the control-to-evidence mapping reads to your team, and the total quoted price including the frameworks you need. Vanta has the widest name recognition and integration library; Drata is frequently praised for its monitoring workflow and UX.
Can these platforms handle ISO 27001 and other frameworks, not just SOC 2?
Yes. Every tool here supports multiple frameworks and maps shared evidence across them, so controls you collect for SOC 2 can also satisfy ISO 27001, and many add HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and others. Hyperproof and Anecdotes.ai are built specifically for organizations running many overlapping frameworks at once. Just confirm that added frameworks are included in your quote, since pricing often rises per framework.
Do I still need a security team if I use one of these tools?
Yes. The platform automates evidence and flags drift, but someone still has to own the program: triage failing controls, run access reviews, complete vendor security reviews, and maintain policies. Higher-touch options like Secureframe and bundled offerings like Thoropass reduce how much expertise you need in-house, but none of them replace an owner accountable for the controls actually operating.
Related Guides
Ready to Choose?
Compare features, read reviews, and find the right tool.