How does the Budget Simulation differ from a standard citizen budget document?
The Budget Simulation transforms static citizen budget documents into an interactive learning tool. Instead of just presenting information, it allows residents to actively manipulate budget variables, understand trade-offs, and provide direct input, offering a more powerful and engaging experience than a PDF.
What kind of data does the 'Research Version' of the simulation provide that a typical survey does not?
The 'Research Version' is designed to yield 'sincere preferences data.' This means it captures more authentic insights into residents' true willingness to pay or cut services by making them experience the constraints and trade-offs, which is often missing from simpler survey responses.
Can the Prioritize tool be used for projects beyond just budget allocation, such as urban planning or climate initiatives?
Yes, while primarily used for budget projects, the Prioritize tool is flexible enough to gather stakeholder preferences on a variety of initiatives, including housing, climate, and general planning projects, by allowing users to select and rank order their preferences.
How does the platform ensure that the input collected from residents is informed and not just based on initial reactions?
The platform ensures informed input by presenting residents with the same financial constraints and contextual information that decision-makers face. This educates users on the realities of public finance, encouraging them to provide more thoughtful and practical feedback rather than uninformed opinions.
Is it possible to use Balancing Act for internal government meetings or only for external public engagement?
Balancing Act includes a 'Meeting Mode' specifically designed to turn the simulation into a facilitation tool for both online and face-to-face meetings. This allows it to be used effectively for internal discussions and workshops, as well as for broader public engagement.